NRRT Inc. Newsletter Oct 14

Northern Rivers Rail Trail Inc.
A regional cycling and walking trail for all the community.

Hi Steve,

BYRON COUNCIL ON BOARD!

MYTHS DEBUNKED.

NSW Government Response to Legislative Council Inquiry: Tourism in Local Communities

   RAIL Trailers rejoiced and TOOT members were trumped at last Thursday’s Byron Council meeting.

Councillors voted to throw further support behind plans to build the Northern Rivers Rail Trail on the rail corridor between Casino and Murwillumbah.

Council will now write to Ballina MP Don Page, thanking him for his efforts so far in securing funding for the project and noting that council fully supports the NRRT project.

Geoff Meers, from Northern Rivers Rail Trail Incorporated, applauded council’s vote yesterday.

“Byron Shire has always tried to have a bet each way on the Rail Trail,” Mr Meers said .

“They have seemingly supported the rail trail while still supporting the option of a return of rail.

“Lismore Council and Tweed Council have always been 100% behind the concept and this will lock Byron in behind the plan.

“This will gives Mr Page the assurance he needs about local support so he can go in and lobby harder for the State Government funding.”

Mr Meers does not share the fears held by some that the decision would clear the way for an eventual sell-off of the rail corridor or would sound the death-knell for the return of rail at a future date.

“We will end up with a well-maintained rail corridor making it easy to return rail services,” he said.

Councillors Richardson, Cameron, Dey and Spooner voted against the motion.
Councillor Spooner had previously said he would support the rail trail if certain criteria were met. These criteria have been met or are in the process of being looked at.


Happy committee members following councils decision. Steve Martin, Charlie Hewitt, Sol Ibrahim, Marie Lawton, Cameron Arnold and John Bennett.


LET’S explode some rail trail myths. Much misinformation is circulated around the region. Myths may seem appealing but inevitably lead people to wrong conclusions.

Myth #1: The rail trail will lead to a loss of the rail corridor to private interests.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The government has always stressed that the corridor will remain in public ownership.

Don Page has said the rail trail would not affect public ownership. Northern Rivers Rail Trail supporters have consistently advocated for the corridor to remain in public hands so that train services can be returned when they become viable.

Not building the rail trail is a bigger risk to the corridor staying in public ownership. The government will not leave the unused corridor to deteriorate for ever. If it is unused, there will be pressure within government for a sell-off.

Encouraging private entrepreneurs to run tourist ventures in the corridor also risks public ownership. These business people will want long term leases over what is currently public land. This will restrict access to those who can afford to pay for a tourist ride.

Only the rail trail will ensure locals and tourists alike will be able to use the corridor, for free, whenever they like.

Myth #2: Returning the rail service will solve our public transport problems. 

A rail service on the existing line cannot be effective in delivering public transport.

The line does not go to/from where most people need it. Services could never be frequent enough to meet the needs of the few who would use it.

Instead of campaigning for a poor public transport solution, the rail line, we should be advocating for more frequent, faster and more flexible bus services that will actually meet our needs.

The rail trail will allow more people to walk and cycle for local trips and reduce the number of trips made by car.

Myth #3: Building a rail trail will close off options for the return of rail.

The rail trail will preserve the rail corridor.

Constructing the trail will protect the existing rail formation and maintain it in perfect condition for the return of rail services.

Removing rails and sleepers at this stage will reduce the future costs of reconstructing the line for trains.

Any decent rail service will need new ballast, sleepers and much of the rails to run safely at a speed that meets public transport expectations.

Myth #4: The obvious deterioration in the current rail asset can be repaired cheaply. 

Numerous studies have confirmed the poor state of the rail line between Casino and Murwillumbah.

Two years ago, the state government report indicated a repair cost of $900 million.

Some have suggested this was inflated. But this is to repair the 164 bridges (rail over road, creeks and flood plains) total length 5.5 km, nine tunnels (total 1.8km), hundreds of culverts and 40 registered level crossings; to say nothing of the repair of landslips and other geotechnical issues, the fencing, stations and the line itself.

This would still only get the line back to operating safely with all the speed restrictions of the 1890s alignment.

Given inflation and further deterioration, the 2014 cost would be in excess of the 2012 estimates. The rail trail is far less costly for much greater return.

Myth #5: The rail corridor services most of the region’s population.

Standard public transport calculations of numbers likely to use a rail service are based on a radius of 800m from a station.

All of Ballina, most of Tweed, most of Lismore and a fair proportion of Byron Shire fall outside those circles.

A very small proportion of the regional population is within the rail catchment.

Once people have to use their car to get to a train station, they will only get out of the car if the train service has a significant cost and time saving. This would not be the case if services were reinstated.

If cycling and walking facilities are made available on the rail trail, more people will walk and ride for many of their daily journeys.

* Geoff Meers is a committee member of Northern Rivers Rail Trail Incorporated. He was an infrastructure program manager at the Queensland Department of Transport looking after public transport and cycling infrastructure in south-east Queensland. He lives in Suffolk Park and sees the rail trail as a “great example of effective use of valuable infrastructure for all the community” 


NSW Government Response to Legislative Council Inquiry: Tourism in Local Communities

Recommendation 20: That the NSW Government allow disused rail corridors in New South Wales, or land immediately adjoining the rails that belong to the Government, to be developed into rail trails.

Government Response: Supported in principle

The NSW Government recognises that rail trails have the potential to bring social and economic

benefits to local and regional communities. The Government takes a responsible approach to

unused rail lines by considering their feasibility as potential rail corridors or rail trails on a case-by-case basis.

In the 2014-15 Budget, the NSW Government announced a $110 million Regional TourismInfrastructure Fund (RTIF). The RTIF will enable regional destinations to develop their full potential by investing in critical visitor economy infrastructure, which could include rail trail infrastructure.

The RTIF is administered by Infrastructure NSW, and projects must meet Restart NSW requirements. NSW Trade & Investment is currently reviewing and preparing recommendations to the Government in relation to the governance arrangements required to establish a program for rail trails generally, and the proposed Casino to Murwillumbah rail trail in particular, in consultation with Infrastructure NSW and Transport for NSW.



SUPPORT THE RAIL TRAIL

Print Friendly, PDF & Email